Tuesday, April 11, 2017

An exemplar of misunderstanding and misplaced emotions



An exemplar of misunderstanding and misplaced emotions:

In Longview, Washington birch trees planted along streets have become infested with aphids (so the reports say, I have not checked to confirm that they are aphids and not a different hemipteran taxon). The city’s solution to this problem appeared to be removal of the trees, a solution that met with some resistance from tree lovers. The city council proposed applying imidacloprid in granular form around the bases of the trees. Not surprisingly, given the outcry against neonicotinoids, there was an outcry against this idea. A group of school girls, pictured in the news at their ‘pollination garden’, put together a presentation for the city council to ‘save the bees’ and when the motion came up for a vote it could not even find anyone to second it. The girls were lauded as having succeeded in ‘saving the bees’.

The problem with this story is the neglect in paying attention to the biology of the situation and acting in a rational way in the light of the biological knowledge: honey bees generally don’t spend time foraging at a wind pollinated plant such as the birch. It’s not worth their while and optimal foraging theory and empirical observation would suggest scout bees would not recruit other bees to such a resource. There is evidence of solitary bees and even honey bees using birch pollen though, especially when other resources are scarce. Birch blooms in the early spring and this can be accounted for by avoiding this time for treating the trees. Given the proper timing, the risk to bees from this application of imidacloprid would be very low and a cost/benefit analysis would suggest the treatment should go ahead.

Other solutions to the aphid problem are possible, of course, such as release of lady beetles, spraying with soaps or botanical oils, or even high pressure water treatment, but it’s a bit disconcerting that biology is often ignored when people attempt to ‘save’ the players involved in a biological game. This result is a clear abrogation of the basic principles of Integrated Pest Management (IPM).